Evaluation of influence of mobility management instruments implemented in separated areas of the city on the changes in modal split

Authors

  • Katarzyna Nosal Cracow University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow, Poland Author
  • Wiesław Starowicz Cracow University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow, Poland Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5604/08669546.1185186

Keywords:

mobility management, modal split, transport accessibility, fuzzy inference

Abstract

The article presents results of research aimed at construction of the model for evaluation of potential impact of mobility management instruments implemented in areas of high volume of work related trips. The model helps forecast the impact of the instruments application on the changes in modal split. In proposed approach the potential decrease in the car share depends on the improvement of public transport accessibility of the area and its current private transport accessibility. Due to the specific nature of the analyzed problem the elements of fuzzy set theory have been used to construct the model. To determine unknown volumes of decreases results achieved during implementation of mobility plans in the European workplaces with high number of employees have been taken under consideration. Approximation of the surface received as a result of fuzzy inference has been conducted using formula of multiple linear regression. Prepared model has been applied on the example of Cracow to evaluate of potential impact of mobility plans on the change in modal split.

References

BANISTER, D., 2005. Unsustainable Transport: City Transport in the New Century. London: Routledge.

BOJCZUK, J., 2011. Przykłady wdrożeń planów mobilności w Londynie. Transport Miejski i Regionalny, 1, pp. 2-8.

CHAPMAN, S., WEIR, D., 2008. Accessibility Planning Methods. Research Report 363. Available: http://www.landtransport.govt.nz/research/reports/363.pdf [01.09.2014].

CiViTAS ARCHIMEDES. Donostia–San Sebastián Travel Plans (Commuters). Available: http://www.civitas.eu/sites/default/files/arc_mert_33b_f_dss_commutertravelplans.pdf [01.03.2015].

CiViTAS CARAVEL, 2008. MERS 11.9. An integrated mobility plan for the Technical University of Krakow. Kraków.

CiViTAS MODERN. Software tools for mobility management actions in industrial areas in Craiova. Available: http://www.civitas.eu/sites/default/files/modern_cr_m04.08.pdf [01.03.2015].

COM, 2007. Green paper. Towards a new culture of urban mobility. Brussels.

COM, 2009. Action Plan on urban mobility. Brussels.

COM, 2011. White paper 2011 – Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area - Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. Brussels.

DRIANKOV, D., 1996. Wprowadzenie do sterowania rozmytego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowo Techniczne.

FARON, A., 2014. Wpływ wybranych czynników struktury funkcjonalno - przestrzennej miasta na podział zadań przewozowych. Praca doktorska. Politechnika Krakowska. Kraków.

GARLING, T., STEG, L. 2007. Threats from car traffic to the quality of urban life. Oxford: Elsevier.

IDAE, 2002. The Mobility Plan of Tres Cantos industrial area. Available: http://www.managenergy.net/resources/513#.ViuO8G6E3d4 [01.08.2014].

INVOLVE. Involving the private sector in Mobility Management. Available: http://www.involve-project.eu/ [01.03.2015].

JACYNA, M., WASIAK, M., LEWCZUK, K., KŁODAWSKI, M., 2014. Simulation model of transport system of Poland as a tool for developing sustainable transport. Archives of Transport, 31(3), pp. 23-35.

KACPRZYK, J., 1986. Zbiory rozmyte w analizie systemowej. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

KONSORCJUM WYKONAWCÓW: POLITECHNIKA KRAKOWSKA, PBS sp. z o.o., JAN FRIEDBERG, EKKOM Sp.o.o. INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMNT SERVICES sp. z o.o., 2014. Badania zachowań komunikacyjnych mieszkańców Krakowskiego Obszaru Metropolitarnego. Kraków.

LEPT. Workplace Travel Plan Forums: Experience from the Golden Mile Transport Group. Available: http://www.goldenmilegroup.org.uk/wla/goldenmile.nsf [01.04.2014].

LITMAN, T., 2008. Evaluating Accessibility for Transportation Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Available: http://www.vtpi.org/access.pdf [01.08.2014].

LOUKOPOULOS, P., 2007. A classification of travel demand management measures. In: GARLING, T., STEG, L. Threats from car traffic to the quality of urban life: problems, causes and solutions. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 275-292.

MAMDANI, E.H., 1977. Application of Fuzzy Logic to approximate reasoning using linguistic synthesis. IEEE Transactions on computers, 26 (12), pp. 1182-1191.

MEYER, M. D., 1999. Demand management as an element of transportation policy: using carrots and sticks to influence travel behaviour. Transportation Research Part A 33, pp. 575-599.

MoMa.BIZ. The Mobility Management for Business and Industrial Zones. Available: http://www.moma.biz/en [01.08.2014].

NOSAL, K., 2009. Wpływ planów mobilności na zmianę zachowań komunikacyjnych. Modelowanie podróży i prognozowanie ruchu. Zeszyty naukowo-techniczne Stowarzyszenia Inżynierów i Techników Komunikacji Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej Oddział w Krakowie, 90 (148), pp. 177 – 196.

NOSAL, K., 2014. Wybrane wyniki badań ankietowych dotyczących zachowań komunikacyjnych i preferencji pracowników i klientów Urzędu Miejskiego Wrocławia, przeprowadzonych pod kątem realizacji planu mobilności. Transport Miejski i Regionalny, 12, pp. 25-30.

OECD, 2014. Effective Transport Policies for Corporate Mobility Management. Available: http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/pub/pdf/10Corporate.pdf [01.08.2014].

PTV AG. VISUM 13 User Manual.

RUDNICKI et al. 2010. Innowacje na rzecz zrównoważonego transportu miejskiego, doświadczenia z realizacji projektu Unii Europejskiej CIVITAS-CARAVEL. Kraków: Wydawnictwo PiT.

RUTKOWSKA, D., 1997. Sieci neuronowe, algorytmy genetyczne i zbiory rozmyte. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

SANDYFORD SMARTER TRAVEL, 2012. Sandyford business district. Area Wide Mobility Management Plan. Available: http://www.sandyfordsmartertravel.ie/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/sst-plan-summary.pdf [01.03.2015].

STAROWICZ, W., 2007. Jakość przewozów w miejskim transporcie zbiorowym. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej.

STAROWICZ, W., 2011. Zarządzanie mobilnością wyzwaniem polskich miast. Transport Miejski i Regionalny, 1, pp. 42-47.

STATPOINT Inc., 2005. Statgraphics Centurion XV User Manual.

STRADLING, S. G., MEADOWS, M. L., BEATTY, S., 2000. Helping drivers out of their cars. Integrating transport policy and social psychology for sustainable change. Transport Policy, 7, pp. 207-215.

SZARATA, A., 2013. Modelowanie podróży wzbudzonych oraz tłumionych zmianą stanu infrastruktury transportowej, Monografia. Inżynieria Lądowa, nr 439.

SZARATA, A., 2014. The multimodal approach to the modelling of modal split. Archives of Transport, 29(1), pp. 55-63.

TAYLOR, M. A. P., AMPT, E. S., 2003. Travelling smarter down under: Policies for voluntary travel behaviour change in Australia. Transport Policy, 10, pp. 165-177.

THE MATH WORKS INC., 2000. Fuzzy logic toolbox. User Guide. version 2.

VALIENTE, P., 2012. Involving the Private Sector in Mobility Management. Available: http://www.involve-project.eu/assets/Downloads/Madrid/3a-GP10-Paz-Valiente-MADRID-COUNCIL-SUMPS-and-private-involvement.pdf [01.08.2014].

WATH WORKS, 2012. Matlab R2012b.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-30

Issue

Section

Original articles

How to Cite

Nosal, K., & Starowicz, W. (2015). Evaluation of influence of mobility management instruments implemented in separated areas of the city on the changes in modal split. Archives of Transport, 35(3), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.5604/08669546.1185186

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 322

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.