Research on high-fidelity reconstruction algorithm for vehicle trajectory based on centralized spatiotemporal feature fusion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61089/aot2025.13gyse14Keywords:
Vehicle trajectory, Data reconstruction, Improved SOFTS algorithm, Spatiotemporal featuresAbstract
Vehicle trajectory data, primarily characterized by time-series features, serves as the key information carrier for vehicle movement, which documents dynamic characteristics such as positions, velocities, and accelerations across spatiotemporal dimensions. This data underpins critical tasks including microscopic traffic flow modeling, driving state analysis, and traffic safety assessment. To address the challenge that low-sampling-rate vehicle trajectory data induces the loss of high-frequency motion details in intelligent transportation systems and that traditional methods fail to simultaneously satisfy the requirements for both high precision and motion plausibility due to disjointed spatiotemporal modeling and lack of physical constraints, this study proposes a high-fidelity vehicle trajectory reconstruction algorithm based on centralized spatiotemporal feature fusion. The algorithm, based on the SOFTS (Series-cOre Fused Time Series) framework, constructs a global-local collaborative spatiotemporal feature representation mechanism through a multidimensional enhanced STAR (Spatio-Temporal Aggregation and Representation) module. Specifically, it incorporates a spatio-temporal embedding layer to capture interdependencies between timestamps and spatial coordinates. Residual connections are employed to preserve original trajectory details, while a spatial proximity weighting mechanism optimizes core feature aggregation. A dynamic weight matrix is constructed to adaptively focus on velocity-position correlations among neighboring vehicles within a 20-meter-radius range. Kinematic constraints are integrated to ensure physical plausibility of reconstructed trajectories, including the introduction of a kinematic loss function. This function leverages acceleration smoothness regularization terms and trajectory curvature continuity regularization to guide the model toward physically feasible solutions in compliance with vehicle dynamics. To validate its effectiveness, the proposed method was extensively validated using public datasets (NGSIM, HighD, and CQSkyeyeX) and systematically compared with traditional approaches (e.g., linear interpolation) and deep learning models. Experimental results clearly show that the improved algorithm significantly outperforms baseline methods in interpolation accuracy, spatiotemporal smoothness, and computational efficiency. The research findings can be applied to high-frequency trajectory generation for autonomous driving, microscopic traffic flow simulation, and other domains, providing critical technical support for upgrading intelligent transportation systems from data collection to decision-making optimization.
References
1. Amin, F., Gharami, K., & Sen, B. (2024). TrajectoFormer: Transformer-based trajectory prediction of autonomous vehicles with spatio-temporal neighborhood considerations. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 17(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-024-00410-1
2. Biszko, K., Oskarbski, J., & arski, K. (2024). Impact of different car-following models on estimating safety and emissions on signal-controlled intersections using microscopic simulations. Archives of Transport, 72(4), 43-73. https://doi.org/10.61089/aot2024.eb2hfe27
3. Gu, M., Su, Y., Wang, C., & Guo, Y. (2024). Trajectory planning for automated merging vehicles on freeway acceleration lane. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 73(11), 16108–16124. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2024.3430291
4. Han, L., Chen, X.-Y., Ye, H.-J., & Zhan, D.-C. (2024). SOFTS: Efficient multivariate time series forecasting with series-core fusion (No. arXiv:2404.14197). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.14197
5. He, S., Shen, L., Wu, Q., & Yuan, C. (2024). A certified cubic B-spline interpolation method with tangential direction constraints. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 37(3), 1271–1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-024-2420-0
6. Ip, A., Irio, L., & Oliveira, R. (2021). Vehicle trajectory prediction based on LSTM recurrent neural networks. 2021 IEEE 93rd Vehicular Technology Conference (Vtc2021-Spring), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/VTC2021-Spring51267.2021.9449038
7. Jiang, Y., Zhu, B., Yang, S., Zhao, J., & Deng, W. (2023). Vehicle trajectory prediction considering driver uncertainty and vehicle dynamics based on dynamic bayesian network. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 53(2), 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2022.3186639
8. Jiang, J., Zuo, Y., Xiao, Y., Zhang, W., & Li, T. (2024). STMGF-Net: a spatiotemporal multi-graph fusion network for vessel trajectory forecasting in intelligent maritime navigation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25(12), 21367-21379. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2024.3465234
9. Lei, J., Xun, Y., He, Y., Liu, J., Mao, B., & Guo, H. (2024). Flexible Multi-Channel Vehicle Trajectory Prediction Based on Vehicle-Road Collaboration.Proceedings - IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2024 IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2024, December 8, 2024 - December 12, 2024, Cape Town, South africa.
10. Li, F.-J., Zhang, C.-Y., & Chen, C. L. P. (2023). STS-DGNN: Vehicle trajectory prediction via dynamic graph neural network with spatial–temporal synchronization. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 72, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2023.3307179
11. Li, H., & Yu, L. (2025). Prediction of traffic accident risk based on vehicle trajectory data. Traffic Injury Prevention, 26(2), 164–171. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15389588.2024.2402936
12. Li, Q., Ou, B., Liang, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, X., & Li, L. (2023). TCN-SA: A social attention network based on temporal convolutional network for vehicle trajectory prediction. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2023, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1286977
13. Liu, Z., Fang, J., Tong, Y., & Xu, M. (2020). Deep learning enabled vehicle trajectory map-matching method with advanced spatial–temporal analysis. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 14(14), 2052–2063. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2020.0486
14. Lin, X., Tan, C., & Lin, X. (2024). Short term road network Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram parameters and traffic state prediction based on LSTM. Archives of Transport, 71(3), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.61089/aot2024.qxx9rh86
15. Quddus, M., & Washington, S. (2015). Shortest path and vehicle trajectory aided map-matching for low frequency GPS data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 55, 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.02.017
16. Rathore, P., Kumar, D., Rajasegarar, S., Palaniswami, M., & Bezdek, J. C. (2019). A scalable framework for trajectory prediction. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20(10), 3860–3874. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2019.2899179
17. Reis, J., Yu, G., & Silvestre, C. (2023). Kalman-based velocity-free trajectory tracking control of an underactuated aerial vehicle with unknown system dynamics. Automatica, 155, 111148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2023.111148
18. Singh, D., & Srivastava, R. (2022). Graph neural network with RNNs based trajectory prediction of dynamic agents for autonomous vehicle. Applied Intelligence, 52(11), 12801–12816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-03120-9
19. Waddell, J. M., Remias, S. M., Kirsch, J. N., & Trepanier, T. (2020). Utilizing low-ping frequency vehicle trajectory data to characterize delay at traffic signals. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 146(8), 4020069. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000382
20. Wang, J., Liang, Y., Tang, J., & Wu, Z. (2024). Vehicle trajectory reconstruction using lagrange-interpolation-based framework. Applied Sciences, 14(3), 1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14031173
21. Wang, T., Fu, Y., Cheng, X., Li, L., He, Z., & Xiao, Y. (2025). Vehicle Trajectory Prediction Algorithm Based on Hybrid Prediction Model with Multiple Influencing Factors. Sensors, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/s25041024
22. Wang, Y., Gao, S., Wang, Y., Wang, P., Zhou, Y., & Xu, Y. (2021). Robust trajectory tracking control for autonomous vehicle subject to velocity-varying and uncertain lateral disturbance. Archives of Transport, 57(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.7480
23. Yang, X., Liang, G., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Chen, Z., Yang, X., & Wang, Z. (2025). Research on the Spatiotemporal Evolution of Disturbed Through Vehicles at Signalized Intersections Based on Trajectory Data. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 151(7), 04025040. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-9029
24. Yang, G., Wang, Z., Xu, H., & Tian, Z. (2018). Feasibility of using a constant acceleration rate for freeway entrance ramp acceleration lane length design. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 144(3), 6017001. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000122
25. Youssef, T., Zemmouri, E., & Bouzid, A. (2023). STM-GCN: a spatiotemporal multi-graph convolutional network for pedestrian trajectory prediction. Journal of Supercomputing, 79(18). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05467-x
26. Zhang, Q., Bhattarai, N., Chen, H., Xu, H., & Liu, H. (2023). Vehicle trajectory tracking using adaptive kalman filter from roadside lidar. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 149(6), 4023043. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-7535
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used in the research process are all publicly available and can be accessed through the following link.
https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/trafficanalysistools/ngsim.htm
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Archives of Transport journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.